Legal Opinion
Beebe v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 22, 1948No. 31759PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
The application for contempt was served on the attorney of record for the defendant. It is the contention of the defendant that the service of the application of the receiver for contempt on the attorney of record for the defendant was contrary to law and ineffectual, and that any further proceedings in the contempt case were nugatory. This contention of the defendant is based on the provisions of the Code, § 81-213, which reads as follows: “Service of extraordinary process. When extraordinary process shall be granted, the clerk shall annex the same, together with the process, to the original…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Cedartown Cotton & Export Co. v. MilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Holman v. Mayor of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1871
- Cabot v. YarboroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Remley v. DeWallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Community Gas Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Piedmont Life Insurance Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- American Thread Co. v. RochesterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Midland Properties Co. v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.