Legal Opinion
Matter of Rosen
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 13, 1989No. 86-1464PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Per curiam
In this attorney discipline case, we must decide whether respondent misrepresented material facts in applying for admission in Maryland in violation of Disciplinary Rule 1-101(A) of the Code of Professional Responsibility,1 and if so, what sanctions to impose. The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended respondent’s suspension from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a year and a day. We order his suspension for nine months, with a requirement that he furnish proof of rehabilitation as a condition of his reinstatement.2
I
Respondent Sol Z. Rosen, a member of the bar…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Bar Grievance Administrator v. Del RioMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re GilbertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re JordanIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re StarnesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Goldschmidt v. Paley Rothman Goldstein Rosenberg & Cooper, CharteredDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re DemosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.