In Re Gilbert
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
In this professional responsibility case, we must determine whether respondent James H. Gilbert should be reciprocally disciplined in this jurisdiction, pursuant to District of Columbia Bar Rule XI, § 18(5), as a consequence of his disbarment by the Court of Appeals of Maryland on October 6, 1986. Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Gilbert, 307 Md. 481, 515 A.2d 454 (1986). The Board on Professional Responsibility has recommended that reciprocal discipline be imposed and that, accordingly, respondent be disbarred. In opposition to that recommendation, respondent offers four reasons,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Application of G. L. S.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Carver v. ClephaneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- In Re Application of James G.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Matter of RosenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re DemosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re RobertsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Re WebsterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.