Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Whaley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 6, 1988No. 3474PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This appeal is from a denial of a PCHA petition and involves PCHA counsel’s motion to withdraw on the grounds that the appeal is frivolous. Following an initial Order from the panel granting counsel’s petition to with*26draw, but remanding for appointment of new counsel, we now affirm that portion of our September 6, 1988 Order which granted counsel’s petition to withdraw but reverse that portion remanding for appointment of new counsel to proceed with appellant’s appeal on his post-conviction relief action.

The area of collateral appeals in criminal actions has recently undergone…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. McClendonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MapleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. WeinderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API