Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Maple

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1989No. 3231PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, dismissing without a hearing appellant Jonathan Maple’s petition under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9551 (repealed and replaced by the Post Conviction Relief Act, 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546, effective April 13,1988). The dismissal was based on a “Finley disposition” wherein appointed counsel informed the PCHA court that “after interviewing the defendant and reviewing the record and the applicable law, it was his professional opinion that no issues of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RykardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Commonwealth v. JetteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. IngramSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. SaundersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API