Busk v. Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. (In Re Amazon.com, Inc.)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court 1
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs in this purported class action seek compensation under Nevada and Arizona law for time spent undergoing or waiting to undergo mandatory onsite security screenings at the Amazon facilities where they worked. The district court granted summary judgment for Defendants on the grounds that time related to security checks is not compensable as "hours worked" under Nevada and Arizona labor law. Because we conclude that time spent undergoing mandatory security checks is compensable under Nevada law, we REVERSE the district court's judgment with regard to the Nevada…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Clay; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stoetzl v. Dept. of Human ResourcesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- DOE DANCER I VS. LA FUENTE, INC.Nevada Supreme Court · 2021
- Neal Heimbach v. Amazon.comCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Crook v. PJ Operations, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.