Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ross v. Nance

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1990No. CV-90-0001-SAPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Justice.

FACTS AND JURISDICTION

Respondent William Daniel Nance was arrested for driving while intoxicated. Approximately one hour after his arrest, respondent submitted to a breath test that resulted in a blood alcohol content (BAC) of .110. Pursuant to A.R.S. § 28-694, the arresting officer served respondent with an order of suspension of driving privileges. Respondent timely requested an administrative hearing under the statute. At the hearing, the BAC test result was received without objection. Thé hearing officer ordered respondent’s license suspended. Respondent then moved…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State Ex Rel. Corbin v. PickrellArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Martin v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  2. SVENDSEN v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Bierner v. State, Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Knapp v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. State v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API