State v. Lewis
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Defendant contends the court violated G.S. 1-180 by expressing an implication that the penetration element of the crime of rape had been proven. Although the statute refers to the formal instructions to the jury, it has always been construed to forbid the judge to convey to the trial jury in any way at any stage of the trial his opinion on the facts involved in the case. State v. Canipe, 240 N.C. 60, 81 S.E. 2d 173 (1954).
On direct examination of Flossie Williams Jones, she testified as follows:
“Q. About an inch or so, you say?
Objection: She didn’t say an inches or anything like…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. NoellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. CanipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. HoyleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. AlstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. FrancumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979