Legal Opinion
State v. David Villarreal
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided January 23, 2014No. 13-13-00253-CRPublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice LONGORIA.
This is an interlocutory appeal in a case involving a mandatory blood, draw. See Tex. Tbansp. Code Amn. .§ 724.012(b)(3)(B) (West 2011). The trial court granted a motion to suppress, filed by appellee, David Villarreal, the defendant who is charged in the underlying case with driving while intoxicated (“DWI”). See U.S. Const. amend. IV; Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 49.04 (West Supp.2012). The State now appeals the court’s ruling by one issue. See Tex. Code Chim. PROG. Ann. art. 44.01(a)(5) (West Supp.2012) (authorizing interlocutory appeal of order granting motion…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Daniel James Weems v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
- Kenneth Lee Douds v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
- Jesse Thomas Sutherland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
- State v. Ester Aboytes Anderson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2014
- Clayton Dean Reeder v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2014
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.