Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Gillarde

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 22, 1941No. Gen. No. 41,752PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

July 20, 1935, the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company, a corporation, brought an action against defendants to recover $496.58, the charges for transporting a carload of lettuce from Watsonville, California to Boston, Massachusetts. When the car reached Boston the purchaser refused to accept the lettuce and it was afterward sold by the railroad company for $60.32. The railroad gave credit for this amount leaving $436.26. Interest was claimed on this sum from the date the lettuce was shipped, July 6, 1932. Defendants filed an affidavit of defense and recoupment denying liability…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. LindellSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. California Fruit Growers ExchangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. H. Rouw Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. H. Rouw Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Freedman v. Erie RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  2. Mirski v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  3. Mirski v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1963
  4. Railway Exp. Agency v. AndersonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API