Legal Opinion

Mirski v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 7, 1963No. Gen. 49,048Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

44 Ill. App.2d 48 (1963)

194 N.E.2d 361

Ted Mirski, Appellee and Cross-Appellant,

v.

The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, a Corporation, Appellant and Cross-Appellee.

Gen. No. 49,048.

Illinois Appellate Court — First District, First Division.

October 7, 1963.

Rehearing denied October 31, 1963.

Gardner, Carton, Douglas & Chilgren, of Chicago (Joseph P. Carr and John K. Notz, Jr., of counsel), for appellant and cross-appellee.

H. Haskell Lurie, of Chicago (Martin F. Hauselman, of counsel), for appellee and cross-appellant.

2Opinion of the Court · MurphyJustice Murphy

Plaintiff sues for damages allegedly sustained by reason of the deterioration…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Boston & Maine Railroad v. HookerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Reider v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Thompson Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. United States v. Savage Truck Line, Inc. (Four Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API