Legal Opinion

New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. California Fruit Growers Exchange

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 8, 1939PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

This action is for the recovery of freight and refrigeration charges upon a carload of oranges delivered by the defendant as shipper and consignor to the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company in California, consigned by the defendant to itself and its district manager and agent at Providence, Rhode Island, and transported by that railroad and intermediate carriers and by the plaintiff as terminal carrier. The shipment was made under a uniform straight bill of lading in form prescribed by the interstate commerce commission. Shortly after the arrival of the car at Providence the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Arizona Feeds v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Clinchfield Fuel Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1951
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Midstate Horticultural Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Reading Co. v. SobelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API