People v. Servidio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*192OPINION OF THE COURT
Hopkins, J. P.
The defendant challenges his conviction for burglary in the third degree on several grounds. Only one of the grounds demands elaboration.
The defendant urges that his statements to the police in the absence of his attorney representing him on pending unrelated charges should have been suppressed. Because there is no showing that the police officers taking the statements knew that the defendant was represented by counsel on such unrelated charges, we hold that the statements were admissible and were properly not suppressed. Consequently, we affirm the judgment.
I
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. CunninghamNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. ArthurNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. KazmarickNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. ClaudioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. BaldiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. BeverlyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.