Legal Opinion
Matsko v. HARLEY DAVIDSON MOT. CO., INC.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 24, 1984No. 18 and 67PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROSKY, Judge:
This appeal is from judgment on the verdict in a civil case concerning a motorcycle accident. Plaintiff/appellee was the owner/rider of the vehicle and appellants are its manufacturer and seller. Appellants raise, collectively, 14 differ ent issues for our review. Seven of these are addressed substantively in the following opinion and in seven we rely upon the opinion of the court below. On all issues we hold in appellee’s favor. Judgment is, accordingly, affirmed.
Recall Notice
Appellants contend that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a post-accident recall notice…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- United States v. BallinSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Caprara v. Chrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sanderson v. Steve Snyder Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Wilkes-Barre Iron & Wire Works, Inc. v. Pargas of Wilkes-Barre, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Joseph Kelly and Cynthia Kelly v. Crown Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Staymates v. ITT Holub IndustriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Duchess v. Langston Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.