Legal Opinion

Staymates v. ITT Holub Industries

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 2, 1987No. 00801PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment (verdict and delay damages) of $171,350.00 entered against the defendant and additional defendant, ITT Holub Industries and Cincinnati Fan and Ventilator Company, respectively. 1 We reverse.

The facts, viewed in a light most favorable to the verdict-winner, reveal that on the 26th day of May, 1979, the plaintiff James A. Staymates, Jr., as general foreman for Paul Bunyan Rustic Furniture Company, was making a tour of the plant to assess the progress of an order that had to be shipped that day. As he approached the sanding area, Robert Ault was…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. O'NEILL v. Checker Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Alvin DILLINGER, Appellant, v. CATERPILLAR, INC., a Delaware Corporation; Wheeler MacHinery Company, Inc., a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Michael SURACE; Alice Surace, H/w, Appellants, v. CATERPILLAR, INC.; CMI Corporation, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Harford Mutual Insurance v. MoorheadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Ellis v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API