Legal Opinion
Joseph Kelly and Cynthia Kelly v. Crown Equipment Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 25, 1992No. 91-1908PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Circuit Judge
Joseph Kelly and his wife Cynthia Kelly (“plaintiffs”) appeal the order of the district court denying their motion for a new trial in a products liability action under Pennsylvania law against Crown Equipment Company (“defendant”). Defendant removed the case to federal court as autho*1275rized by 28 U.S.C. § 1441, invoking the court’s diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Joseph Kelly was injured in the course of his employment when he dismounted from a stock picker…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Greer v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Throckmorton v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Howard Jay Josephs v. Harris Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Forrest A. Flaminio and Gloria Flaminio v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd., a Japanese CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Pineda v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re Air Crash Disaster.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Stecyk v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Paul R. Forrest v. Beloit Corporation Harnischfeger Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.