Legal Opinion

Weissberger v. Weissberger

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchmuck, J.

Before considering the motion to punish for contempt, plaintiff’s cross-motion for leave to discontinue the action will be determined.

Plaintiff sued the defendant for divorce charging her with adultery. A trial of framed issues was had and she was acquitted of marital duplicity. Thereafter nothing was done by either party. No return was made to Special Term, Part III, and the entry of judgment was left in abeyance. Whether disappointment or ignorance of the law caused his inactivity, the fact remains that the plaintiff allowed the action to remain alive. The defendant, apparently considering…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. In re the Estate of BinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  4. McCarthy v. McCarthyNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Schnabel v. SchnabelNew York Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodda v. RoddaOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Shuart v. ShuartNew York Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Turkus v. TurkusNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Smith v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Weissberger v. WeissbergerNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API