Legal Opinion

Shuart v. Shuart

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1944PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOttaway, J.

Plaintiff wife/p.resents an application Tor counsel fees and alimony fimam action. for;absolute divorce.

*271A similar motion has been previously made. When shortly after the commencement of this action plaintiff made such a motion for counsel fees and alimony, the defendant presented a countermotion for dismissal of the complaint, setting up in his papers that he had secured a divorce decree in the State of Nevada. Although plaintiff on this hearing indicated an intention to attack the Nevada decree on the ground that the husband was not a bona fide resident of Nevada when he asked that court to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. In Re Revocation of Ancillary Letters Testamentary of the Estate of NewcombNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Johnson v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morton v. MortonNew York Family Court · 1950
  2. Kurski v. KurskiNew York Family Court · 1945
  3. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Ernst v. ErnstNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Marcus v. MarcusNew York Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API