Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Bingham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 1943PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The appellant, Charles Brogan, who married the decedent Martha Bingham in 1887 in Ireland, contends that the Surrogate has erroneously denied him a right of election to take an intestate share as against the terms of her will, which makes no provision for him. Martha Bingham died on May 17, 1941.

Shortly after their marriage the appellant and the decedent moved to New York City, where they lived together until they separated in 1908 or 1909. In 1909 they entered into a separation agreement under which she released her dower rights in his property, released him from any further obligation to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. The People v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Lefferts v. LeffertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Standish v. StandishNew York Family Court · 1943
  3. Bloch v. EwingDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1952
  4. Reese v. ReeseNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Reese v. ReeseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API