Schnabel v. Schnabel
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPecora, J.
Defendant moves for reargument of certain motions heretofore decided adversely to him, Beargument is granted and upon reconsideration the following disposition is made.
The original decision denying defendant’s motion to open his default in answering the complaint and to vacate the judgment of separation herein entered on November 15, 1940, and the judgments for temporary alimony entered after April, 1940, is adhered to. Apart from the question of the timeliness of the motion to vacate upon the merits of the application, I do not believe defendant has presented any exculpatory facts to excuse…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Bell v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- In re the Estate of BinghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Teefey v. TeefeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Shuart v. ShuartNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Weissberger v. WeissbergerNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Jolby v. JolbyNew York Family Court · 1943
- Teefey v. TeefeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1976