Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hummel v. Sadler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2002No. 2001-1949PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 84.] THE STATE EX REL. HUMMEL ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. SADLER, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Hummel v. Sadler,

2002-Ohio-3605.] Mandamus and prohibition sought to compel common pleas court judge from exercising any jurisdiction in a noncompetition agreement case, to prevent the judge from adopting or enforcing a magistrate’s decision, to vacate three of the judge’s previous entries, and to dismiss the case—Court of appeals’ dismissal of complaints for writs of prohibition and mandamus affirmed, when—Allegation…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Daggett v. GessamanOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Ass'n for Defense of Washington Local School District v. KigerOhio Supreme Court · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Denton v. BedinghausOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Infinite Security Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties II, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State Ex Rel. Fifth Third Mortgage Co. v. RussoOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State ex rel. Douglas v. BurlewOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State ex rel. Ferguson v. Court of ClaimsOhio Supreme Court · 2003

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API