Legal Opinion
Calderon v. Anderson
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 7, 1996No. B084320PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KITCHING, J.
The California Department of Social Services (Department), by its Director Eloise Anderson, respondent below, appeals from a judgment granting a peremptory writ of administrative mandamus ordering the Department to set aside a May 19, 1992 administrative decision denying Jose Calderon (Calderon), petitioner below, benefits for protective supervision services under the In-Home Supportive Services Program (IHSS).
We find the trial court erred in determining Calderon met the eligibility requirements for protective supervision services set forth in the Departments Manual of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ralphs Grocery Co. v. ReimelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Credit Insurance General Agents Ass'n v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Aguilar v. Association for Retarded CitizensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Skyline Homes, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Communities for a Better Environment v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Diablo Valley College Faculty Senate v. Contra Costa Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Duarte v. Cal. State Teachers' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Norasingh v. LightbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Beverly v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.