Legal Opinion

Skyline Homes, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1985No. Civ. 33121PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORRIS, P. J.

Appeal from an order granting summary judgment.

Facts

The facts of this case are not in dispute. Defendants, Johannes and Cozine, both salesmen employed by plaintiff Skyline Homes, Inc., worked what is commonly known as a fluctuating workweek which guarantees a fixed minimum salary to employees who work varying hours from week to week. Depending on factors such as business volume and the season of the year, the length of defendant’s workweek varied from less than 40 hours some weeks to over 40 hours other weeks. Although Johannes and Cozine were guaranteed a fixed minimum…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Industrial Welfare Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Kenneth Cole Productions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  2. People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Morillion v. Royal Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API