Hampton v. State

In this review the defendant raises three issues:(1) Was it error to limit the testimony of an expert psychologist as to his opinion regarding the reliability of the eyewitness identification of the defendant?(2) Was it error to refuse to give the defendant’s requested identification jury instructions?(8) Was it error to refuse to give the requested jury instruction on circumstantial evidence ?

Defendant’s main contention is that the trial court erred in restricting the testimony of Dr. Terrill Bruett, a psychologist called by the defense to testify regarding *453the reliability of the…