State v. Haseltine

Charles Haseltine appeals his conviction of sexual contact with his sixteen-year-old daughter, in violation of sec. 940.225(2) (e), Stats.,1 and of threatening to harm her if she reported the incident, in viola*94tion of sec. 943.30(1), Stats.2 He contends that the trial court erred in admitting- other crimes evidence; that the rape shield law, sec. 972.11(2) (b), Stats.,3 barred the admission of the evidence; that the prosecution violated the discovery statute, sec. 971.23 (1), Stats ;4 and that the *95trial court erred in admitting a psychiatrist’s testimony. The psychiatrist testified that, in…