Legal Opinion

Thein v. Sticha

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1949No. Civ. 14030PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodell, J.

Appellant brought this possessory action against respondents, who filed a cross-complaint for specific performance. The court found in respondents’ favor; and from a decree entered on the findings this appeal was taken. • Appellant owned a piece of improved real property in Bayshore City, San Mateo County. Respondents owned a piece of improved real property in Mill Valley, Marin County. On February 3, 1946, two agreements were entered into between the parties for the sale of the Bayshore City property to respondents and for the sale by them to appellant of the Mill Valley parcel (together…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Shreeves v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Kerr v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Grimes v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hutton v. GliksbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Diamond v. HuenergardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Gale v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Menzel v. SalkaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Carberry v. TrenthamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API