Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Bruns

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1936No. Crim. 300PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURRENTINE, J., pro tem.

It. appears that petitioner herein having been duly subpoenaed, did on the 16th day of December, 1935, appear as a witness before the grand jury of San Diego County for the year 1935, then in session at the San Diego County courthouse in the city, township, and county of San Diego, and which was then engaged in an investigation to determine whether one Edgar Dudley had feloniously conspired with others to bribe a public official to wit, the district attorney of San Diego County. The petitioner having been first lawfully sworn to testify and it being material to this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re GannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. In Re MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Ex parte SternesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. In Re ShulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ex Parte KarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re McKinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. People v. SaffellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1953
  5. Opinion No. (2000), California Attorney General Reports2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API