Shade v. Ayars & Ayars, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
The Nebraska Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court which dismissed Michael A. Shade’s petition seeking workers’ compensation benefits. We granted Shade’s petition for further review, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed as modified.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
A judgment made by the Workers’ Compensation Court after review shall have the same force and effect as a jury verdict in a civil case. A judgment, order, or award of the compensation court may be modified, reversed, or set aside only upon the grounds that (1) the compensation court acted without or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gray v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
- Shade v. Ayars & Ayars, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Paulsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- Larson Ex Rel. Larson v. Hometown Communications, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Stansbury v. HEP, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Buckingham v. Creighton UniversityNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- Hull v. Aetna InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.