Legal Opinion

Shade v. Ayars & Ayars, Inc.

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1994No. A-93-728PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Irwin, Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Michael A. Shade appeals the order of a single judge of the Workers’ Compensation Court, affirmed on review by a three-judge panel, which determined that the injuries he sustained at a company-sponsored picnic were not compensable. We affirm the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court because the employer did not derive a substantial direct benefit from this event sufficient to bring it within the realm of employment.

II. SCOPE OF REVIEW

Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-185 (Supp. 1991), this court may modify, reverse, or set aside a Workers’ Compensation Court…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Pearson v. Lincoln Telephone Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Feaster v. S. K. Kelso & SonsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Chilton v. Bowman Gray School of MedicineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Kraft v. Paul Reed Construction & Supply, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lozano v. Frank DeLuca ConstructionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  2. Shade v. Ayars & Ayars, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API