Shade v. Ayars & Ayars, Inc.
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Irwin, Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Michael A. Shade appeals the order of a single judge of the Workers’ Compensation Court, affirmed on review by a three-judge panel, which determined that the injuries he sustained at a company-sponsored picnic were not compensable. We affirm the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court because the employer did not derive a substantial direct benefit from this event sufficient to bring it within the realm of employment.
II. SCOPE OF REVIEW
Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-185 (Supp. 1991), this court may modify, reverse, or set aside a Workers’ Compensation Court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ricciardi v. Damar Products Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Pearson v. Lincoln Telephone Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1994
- Feaster v. S. K. Kelso & SonsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Chilton v. Bowman Gray School of MedicineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Kraft v. Paul Reed Construction & Supply, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lozano v. Frank DeLuca ConstructionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Shade v. Ayars & Ayars, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994