Inhabitants of Trenton v. City of Brewer
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.
In this action under the pauper statutes, Revised Statutes, Chapter 33, Section 29, as amended by 1931 Laws, Chapter 225, Section 27, plaintiff town gained the general verdict, and was awarded damages, substantially as claimed. Defendant city, by motion for a new trial, challenges the verdict.
In 1933, beginning on April 19, and ending with October 3; and again in 1934, February 10 to December 30, both dates inclusive; one Earland A. Tourtelotte had help, as a pauper, from Trenton. His wife and children were dependent upon him for support; in consequence of his impoverished condition, they too…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. WrightSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1929
- Young v. MakepeaceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Pierce v. RodliffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
- Town of Sherburne v. Town of HartlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1865
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Horner v. FlynnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
- State v. HudonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
- Perry v. ButlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946
- Thompson v. FranckusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.