Legal Opinion

Perry v. Butler

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 8, 1946PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTompkins, J.

This case comes to the Law Court on the plaintiff’s general motion for a new trial under the provisions of Chap. 100 of the Revised Statutes of Maine, 1944, after a general verdict for the defendant, and after denial by the court below of the plaintiff’s motion fop a new trial directed to the presiding justice under Chap. 100, Sec. 60.

The action was in tort for negligence.

The alleged cause of action arose out of a collision which occurred at approximately 6.50 a. m. on November 2,1944, at the *156intersection of Cross and Fore Streets in the City of Portland, between an automobile owned and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Virginian Railway Co. v. HaleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  2. Philadelphia, Baltimore & Washington Railroad v. GattaSupreme Court of Delaware · 1913
  3. Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Sand Springs Railway Co. v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Vicnire v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Henderson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Barlow v. LowerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
  4. Dunmore v. McMillanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Shell Oil Company v. CollarArizona Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API