Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 13, 1944PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

The respondent, convicted under R. S. 1930, Chap. 131, Sec. 10, comes to this Court on appeal and exceptions. This statute provides in part:'

“Whoever embezzles, or fraudulently converts to his own use, or secretes with intent to embezzle or fraudulently convert to his own use, money, goods or property delivered to him, or any part thereof, which may be the subject of larceny, shall be deemed guilty of larceny, and shall be punished accordingly.”

By its enactment “a peculiar species of larceny” was created “where the felonious taking is wanting.” State v. Stevenson, 91 Me., 107, 111, 39 A.,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Stevens v. GaylordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Putney v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. State v. PriestSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1918
  4. Bassett v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  5. State v. StroutSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. CollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  2. State v. WoodardsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. PullenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  4. State v. DoughtySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  5. State v. McKeoughSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API