Legal Opinion

Ammons v. . Fisher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

We do not think any of the exceptions or assignments of error made by plaintiff can be sustained. We have read with care the charge of the court below and think the law applicable to the facts was correctly state'd. The contentions of both sides were fairly and accurately set forth. The record discloses that the defendant M. A. Watkins filed no answer. The case was tried solely on the liability of Adam Fisher, Jr.

The record also discloses that plaintiff tendered the following issues:

“(1) Was the plaintiff’s intestate’s, W. N. Amnions’, death caused by the negligence of the defendant Adam…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shipp Ex Rel. Shipp v. United Stage Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Hargett v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. Shuford v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McGraw v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Hill v. FEDERAL LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API