Hill v. FEDERAL LIFE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
RodmáN, J.
Defendant’s first assignment of error is based on its motion to nonsuit. Two reasons are urged in support of the motion: first, the defense of material false representation rendering the policy void is established by the evidence, and second, plaintiff failed to prove her allegation that she was the holder of the certificate issued by Investors Syndicate and because of such failure has not shown that she is entitled to the proceeds of the policy, if valid.
The charges of false representation permitting defendant to avoid its contract are affirmative defenses as to which it had the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Waddell v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Baker v. VarserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chisholm v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Nellie Tuttle Wiles v. Nationwide Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Abernethy v. HOSPITAL CARE ASS'N, INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Western Carolina Telephone Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Anderson v. East Coast Fish & Scallop Co.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.