Hasson v. Koeberle
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in. the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
On March 7, 1907, the Ord Mountain Gold Company Avas an Arizona corporation, with a capital stock of one million shares of the par value of one dollar each. On that date, the directors held a meeting for the purpose of organization and issued four hundred and fifty thousand shares each to T. N. Hasson and George L. Hasson, respectively, and the remaining one hundred thousand to one Stead-man. Thereupon, the Hassons each undertook to donate back to the corporation íavo hundred and fifty thousand shares by means of the cancellation of the original certificates and the issuance of new…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Holcombe v. Trenton White City Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1912
- Vermont Marble Co. v. Declez Granite Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- Gillett v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
- See v. HeppenheimerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- R. H. Herron Co. v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moore v. MoffattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Kaye v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- California National Supply Co. (A Corporation) v. O'BrienCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Winters v. LindsayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- California National Supply Co. v. DinsmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.