Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. Burkhart

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 1986No. 871; CA A36000PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals from a trial court order holding him in contempt for wilful disobedience of the court’s order that he submit to a blood test and sentencing him to serve 30 days in jail. The dispositive issue is whether the court’s contempt order is sufficient. We reverse and remand.

The contempt proceeding arose out of a disputed paternity proceeding commenced by the state. Defendant was ordered to submit to a blood test. ORS 109.252. 1 He refused to have his blood drawn at the medical facility designated by the trial court. He agreed, however, to have blood drawn by his own doctor and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Spencer v. HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. BaronCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Langdon v. LangdonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Pyle v. PyleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Zollman v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State ex rel. Wynne v. WynneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State ex rel. Radcliffe v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API