Legal Opinion

State v. Baron

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 1984No. C82-06-35768; CA A26664PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for direct criminal contempt. He contends that the trial court’s order finding him in contempt is defective on its face. We agree and reverse and remand for further proceedings.

On June 14, 1982, defendant, an attorney, was representing a client at a sentencing hearing in circuit court. He and the prosecutor recommended that defendant’s client be placed on three years probation, subject to certain conditions. The . judge declined to follow that recommendation and instead imposed a longer probation with stricter conditions.

Defendant then requested an opportunity…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State Ex Rel. Spencer v. HoweOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Brice v. DanischOregon Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of YowmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  2. State ex rel. Goldschmidt v. GoldschmidtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. BurkhartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. State ex rel Connelly v. ConnellyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API