Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Radcliffe v. Kerr

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 1987No. 80-1733-E; CA A38239Published

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a trial court order holding her in criminal contempt for wilful violation of a visitation order. She was sentenced to serve 30 days in jail and fined $300. The sentence and the fine were suspended, and she was placed on 5-year probation. The dispositive issue is whether the order is sufficient. It is not. We reverse and remand.

Defendant contends, inter alia, that the order is insufficient, because it does not specifically identify the statutory basis on which it is entered. We agree. See ORS 33.020; State ex rel AFSD v. Burkhart, 80 Or App 681, 723 P2d 374 (1986).

Defenda…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. BurkhartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API