Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Emond

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 17, 1934No. 6 Div. 355PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The appeal is on the merits and petition or motion for writ of mandamus.

The judgment rendered by the trial court was under section 2210 of the Code, as amended by the act of 1927 (Acts 1927, pp. 753, 708, § 39) at the instance of a party in interest and not the city.

The judgment recited: “ * * * it appearing to the Court on the hearing of this cause on appeal, both from the pleading and proof before the Court, that the assessment involved in this appeal was not properly made by the Commission of the City of Birmingham, plaintiff in this case, in so far as it concerns that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ex parte Tower Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Manchuria S. S. Co. v. Harry G. G. Donald & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Sorsby v. Woodlawn Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  5. Ex Parte GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Riley v. Cornerstone Community Outreach, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  2. City of Birmingham v. TerrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Tyson v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. United States Bond & Mortgage Co. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. City of Birmingham v. SmyerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API