Hamrick v. Town of Albertville
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The appeal is from assessments for municipal street improvements under section 2174 et seq., Code, and was taken by the property owner as the party aggrieved by the decision of municipal authority. Section 2204, Code; Stovall v. City of Jasper, 215 Ala. 300, 110 So. 317; Id., 218 Ala. 282, 118 So. 467.
It is insisted by appellee’s counsel that, if it be found that technical errors intervened; the trial was upon the facts as to special benefits, by reason of the improvements, under section 2210 of the Code; that is, provisions of the statute in the nature of a reassessment. City of Hartselle v.…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- City of Birmingham v. WillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- City of Huntsville v. GudenrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Cooper v. Town of Valley HeadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Baisden v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Blount County v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- McRea v. Marion CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Williams v. City of DothanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Toyah Independent School District v. Pecos-Barstow Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Toyah Ind. Sch. Dist. v. Pecos-Barstow Ind. Sch. Dist.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.