Legal Opinion

City of Birmingham v. Terrell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1935No. 6 Div. 543PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

This is a bill by a property holder against the city of Birmingham to remove a paving assessment lien as a cloud upon the title to real property.

The cause was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, and resulted in a decree to the effect that said plat lots 11 and 12 lying within one-half block of the intersection of Nineteenth street and Avenue U were liable for their due proportion of intersection paving costs under section 2187 of the Code (as amended by Gen. Acts 1927, p. 762, § 16), but that these lots were improperly included as a part of the larger area abutting…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. WillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Penton v. Brown-Crummer Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. City of Huntsville v. GudenrathSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Jasper Land Co. v. City of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Town of BoazSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jefferson County v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. United States Bond & Mortgage Co. v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. City of Boaz v. KelleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Ex Parte FinleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Reynolds v. FabritisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API