Legal Opinion

State v. Kersh

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 4, 2004No. 1868-99PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWomack, J.

KELLER, P.J., and MEYERS, PRICE, JOHNSON, KEASLER, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

This case presents the issue of whether the court of appeals erred in taking jurisdiction of an appeal by the State. Specifically, we must decide whether the State may appeal a trial court’s decision to ignore enhancement allegations that previously have been found to be true when assessing punishment at an adjudication hearing. The answer to this question depends upon whether such a decision is part of the “sentence” under Code of Criminal Procedure articles 42.02 and 44.01(b). Because the meaning of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Sigler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Marshall v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  4. State v. Kersh, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Houston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. Norris Shannon Baines v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2010
  3. Wooldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  4. State v. Wooldridge, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2004
  5. State v. LE RICHARDSON, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API