Legal Opinion

State v. Kersh

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided August 31, 1999No. 14-98-00855-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAURICE E. AMIDEI, Justice.

Appellee, Phillip Wayne Kersh, was charged with possession of a controlled substance. See Tex. Health § Safety Code Ann. § 481.115(a) (Vernon 1996). He pleaded guilty, the trial court deferred adjudication, and the State subsequently moved to adjudicate guilt. The trial court found appellee guilty and sentenced him. The State brings this appeal, contending the trial court illegally sentenced appellee. We reverse and remand.

Appellee was charged by indictment with possession of a controlled substance, a felony. See id. § 481.115(d). The indictment also…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1996
  3. Ray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. State v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
  5. Ward v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Houston v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  2. Lopez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003
  3. State v. KershCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. Anton Devon Nikkynuebe Houston AKA Anton N. Robertson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  5. Bolin, Gary IshmaelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API