Legal Opinion

Wooldridge v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 2005No. PD-0912-04PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HerveyHervey, J.

KELLER, PJ., MEYERS, PRICE, WOMACK, KEASLER, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

Article 44.01(b), Tex.Code CRiM. PROC., allows the State to “appeal a sentence in a case on the ground that the sentence is illegal.” In State v. Kersh, we decided that Article 44.01(b) authorizes the State to appeal a trial court’s decision not to consider its previous “true” findings on enhancement allegations when assessing punishment at an adjudication hearing. See State v. Kersh, 127 S.W.3d 775, 776-77 (Tex.Cr.App.2004). In this case, the Court of Appeals decided that Article 44.01(b) did not authorize the State…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. State v. KershCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. State v. GutierrezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  4. State v. Wooldridge, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2004

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Wooldridge, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
  2. State v. LE RICHARDSON, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  3. Wooldridge v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
  4. Dewayne Heath Wooldridge v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
  5. Dewayne Heath Wooldridge v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API