Wooldridge v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · HerveyHervey, J.
KELLER, PJ., MEYERS, PRICE, WOMACK, KEASLER, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.
Article 44.01(b), Tex.Code CRiM. PROC., allows the State to “appeal a sentence in a case on the ground that the sentence is illegal.” In State v. Kersh, we decided that Article 44.01(b) authorizes the State to appeal a trial court’s decision not to consider its previous “true” findings on enhancement allegations when assessing punishment at an adjudication hearing. See State v. Kersh, 127 S.W.3d 775, 776-77 (Tex.Cr.App.2004). In this case, the Court of Appeals decided that Article 44.01(b) did not authorize the State…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. RossCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- State v. KershCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- State v. GutierrezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
- State v. Wooldridge, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2004
4Cited by11 opinions
- State v. Wooldridge, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2005
- State v. LE RICHARDSON, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Wooldridge v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2010
- Dewayne Heath Wooldridge v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
- Dewayne Heath Wooldridge v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.