Yerger v. Bross
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LA PRADE, Justice.
Judgment in favor of appellees was entered on February 11, 1948, following a verdict in their favor. Within the time prescribed by the rule appellant filed a motion for a new trial followed by an amended motion and a second amended motion. In the latter motion it was alleged and not controverted that the court reporter who had reported the evidence was temporarily incapacitated and that appellant would not be able to perfect his record within ninety days from the date of giving notice of appeal. The motion for a new trial was denied. Notice of appeal from the judgment was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Diamond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Richardson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1907
- Alley v. McCabeIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Miami Copper Co. v. StrohlArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Morin v. ClaflinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. LueckArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Ginn v. Superior Court, in and for County of PimaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
- Rodriquez v. WilliamsArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Mantovani v. GreenArizona Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.