Legal Opinion

Miami Copper Co. v. Strohl

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1913No. Civil No. 1244PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of, the Fifth Judicial District, in and for the County of Gila. E. W. Lewis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFranklin, C. J.

The appellee, as plaintiff, commenced an action in the court below to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him while in the employment of appellant, the defendant. The defendant was, at the time of the injury, engaged in the operation of a mine, and the plaintiff was employed as a pumpman, whose duties required him to descend in the shaft of defendant’s mine by means of a cage furnished by defendant. The gravamen of the plaintiff’s complaint is that defendant failed in its duty as an employer to furnish him with safe appliances and a safe place by which to enter those parts of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Clarendon Land Investment Agency Co. v. McClelland Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  2. State Ex Rel. Barry v. ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. State v. O'BrienMontana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Molt v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Putnam v. PutnamArizona Supreme Court · 1890

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. CashionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Burmister v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hays v. RichardsonArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Richfield Oil Corp. v. LapradeArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Ritter v. Arizona Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API