Legal Opinion
Marjorie G. Hickey, Leona Connelly and Bernard Keegan v. Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 24, 1992No. 90-3616PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAIRCHILD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Marjorie Hickey and other current and retired employees of the Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union and two funds maintained by the Union, brought an action against the three employers for the reduction of accrued benefits under the employer’s Staff Retirement Plan (“the Plan”) in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1054(g)(1) (1984). The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the employees, holding that the Cost-of-Living Adjustment (“COLA”) prescribed by the Plan was an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Gray v. LackeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- John Halpin v. W.W. Grainger, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Mead Corp. v. TilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Europlast, Limited v. Oak Switch Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Lyons v. Georgia-Pacific Corp. Salaried Employees Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Scardelletti v. DeBarrCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Kohl v. Association of Trial Lawyers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Laurenzano v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc. Retirement Income TrustDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.