Mitchell Sneed v. David Donahue
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MILBURN, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Mitchell Sneed appeals the dismissal of his writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alleging that the automatic revocation of his parole without a hearing pursuant to Kentucky law violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. On appeal, the issues are (1) whether the automatic revocation of petitioner’s parole status without a hearing pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statutes Annotated § 439.352 (Baldwin 1962) upon petitioner’s incarceration for conviction of a crime committed while on parole violates the Due Process Clause of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Kellogg v. ShoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Richards v. Eberlin, Unpublished Decision (5-20-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kellogg v. ShoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- State v. MwangiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- United States v. DeRon Edwards RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.