Legal Opinion

Mitchell Sneed v. David Donahue

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1993No. 18-5752PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILBURN, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Mitchell Sneed appeals the dismissal of his writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 alleging that the automatic revocation of his parole without a hearing pursuant to Kentucky law violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. On appeal, the issues are (1) whether the automatic revocation of petitioner’s parole status without a hearing pursuant to Kentucky Revised Statutes Annotated § 439.352 (Baldwin 1962) upon petitioner’s incarceration for conviction of a crime committed while on parole violates the Due Process Clause of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. ShoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Richards v. Eberlin, Unpublished Decision (5-20-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Kellogg v. ShoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  4. State v. MwangiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  5. United States v. DeRon Edwards RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API