Yale v. Edgerton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action was removed to this Court from the District Court for Ramsey county. The jury, before whom the cause was tried, found a verdict for the plaintiff for $2,219.-25. A motion for a new trial, which was made by the defendant, was denied, and he appealed from the order denying the same to this Court. The case is so fully presented in the opinion, in connection with the points of counsel, that a further statement is unnecessary.
Read the full summary
This action was removed to this Court from the District Court for Ramsey county. The jury, before whom the cause was tried, found a verdict for the plaintiff for $2,219.-25. A motion for a new trial, which was made by the defendant, was denied, and he appealed from the order denying the same to this Court. The case is so fully presented in the opinion, in connection with the points of counsel, that a further statement is unnecessary. I. — The defendant insists that the testimony of the plaintiff, in folios 33 to 44 both inclusive, (this testimony was in response to the question, put to the…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court
MoMillaN, J.
The complaint in this action avers, in substance, that on the 1st of March, 1858|, Edgerton, the defendant, loaned the plaintiff, Tale, $300, which Tale promised to pay on the first of June, 1858, with certain interest, and at the same time assigned and delivered to the defendant a chattel mortgage, before that time executed by one A. B. Vaughn to the plaintiff, upon certain pei’sonal property, consisting of a steam mill, and the machinery connected therewith, and also the debt of said Vaughn to the plaintiff, which said chattel mortgage was given to secure, amounting…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Minick v. HuffNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Fletcher v. German-American Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Miamisburg Twine & Cordage Co. v. WohlhuterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Rappaport v. Boyer & Gilfillan Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Morgan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.