Legal Opinion

Al Ghanim Combined Group Co. Gen. Trad. & Cont. W.L.L. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 22, 2003No. 03-271CPublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

This case comes for decision after argument on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (2002), plaintiff contractor initiated a post-award protest seeking injunctive relief requiring the U.S. Army to resolicit a construction contract. Plaintiff bases its protest on alleged flaws in the agency’s evaluation of the proposal submitted by the awardee. Defendant denies that the procurement process was conducted contrary to any applicable regulations or statutes or was arbitrary and capricious.

FACTS

The following…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Linc Government Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Textron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. DMS All-Star Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Gentex Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Hunt Building Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API